WSL2 Support for Windows Server · Issue # · MicrosoftDocs/WSL · GitHub.

Looking for:

Windows server 2016 standard wsl free -  

Click here to DOWNLOAD

     

Windows server 2016 standard wsl free

 

It is now supported on Windows Server version and later. Sign up to join this community. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top. Stack Overflow for Teams — Start collaborating and sharing organizational knowledge. Create a free Team Why Teams? Learn more. Ask Question. Asked 1 year, 9 months ago. Modified 5 months ago. Viewed 7k times. I've not been able to find anything out about when it might be available in a non-insider build of Windows Server Has Microsoft made this information known?

Improve this question. Orion Edwards Orion Edwards 3 3 silver badges 10 10 bronze badges. Add a comment. Sorted by: Reset to default.

Highest score default Date modified newest first Date created oldest first. Improve this answer. LubomirH LubomirH 36 1 1 bronze badge. I feel that I cannot completely answer the question but that there is enough here to at least somewhat sort out the situation: WSL2 was first released as part of Windows 10 version "" Windows Server current LTSC version is version "" It was recently confirmed that WSL2 will be backported to Windows 10 versions "" and "" The Windows Server Semi-Annual Channel SAC , which I believe only carries the Server Core and Nano Server installation types, essentially matches the Windows 10 releases and does have the "" Windows version If what you are looking for is support in Windows Server Windows version "" there has to my knowledge been no word that WSL2 will be backported to this Windows version for either Windows 10 or Windows Server.

Dan Dan 11 1 1 bronze badge. Dudu Dudu 1 1 bronze badge. It is not stated anywhere. The instructions aren't actually totally accurate slightly contradict themselves in a few places - e.

Its all quite the pile of doggy doo! Sign up or log in Sign up using Google. Sign up using Facebook. Sign up using Email and Password.

Yeah, it sounds like the wsl binary is still from WSL1, if it doens't know the --set-default-version parameter, which suggests the whole subsystem is WSL 1 still. I have a multi-container application using Windows containers on Windows, but there are critical issues that have been known for years that prevent MongoDB and possibly other databases from working correctly inside Windows containers.

At this point I don't care if we have to use Windows containers or Linux containers, all I really want are containers on Windows Server However, even Windows containers on Windows suffer from severe limitations and critical issues, so we are stuck with no good option in the end. Otherwise, this really means that if you can put up with the long list of limitations that come with Windows containers, you are still stuck without containerized database support, which is ridiculous. The current ticket, being a report against the docs , is probably not bringing much visibility to a feature request.

So the current thinking is that WSL2 is great as a developer tool on Windows 10, but supporting it officially on Windows Server would give people the wrong idea since they might start using it for production workloads. The thing is that this is precisely what most people waiting for WSL2 on Windows Server want to do it with: run production workloads. I don't see a reason why it would not be possible to make it run unofficially, but it'll always be an unsupported option without Microsoft's stamp of approval.

It's just very frustrating because WSL2 correctly handles filesystem operations required by databases, so it's almost perfect as-is, if only it could be made official. The issue here is that even Windows containers on Windows have several unfixed issues, starting with the lack of graceful shutdown support. Most databases either don't have official images SQL Server !

That's not going to work unless they give "simple" containers a lot more love. I think one of the unspoken reasons for not wanting Linux containers on Windows is because they don't really know how to make this thing integrate well with the Windows security system. It's literally a foreign thing running inside Windows, and how are AVs going to deal with that exactly? And I'm not even talking about how most AVs destroy Docker for Windows by default and barely even have docs on how to make it work correctly.

My guess is they hope most customers would migrate to Kubernetes for their container workloads and simply stick to Windows containers on Windows, and Linux containers on Linux, which means having a pool of Windows and Linux nodes inside a Kubernetes cluster. Hi there. I am in trouble because i have established all my development strategy on deploying a web app through a Docker's container installed on a Windows Server To make a long story short : i have spent a long time on trying to make a linux containers ShinyProxy to be exact works on WS19 before i found this tread.

IE depends on OS , it's die. Old Edge depends on OS , it's die. UWP depends on OS, it's dying. I have trying it on the Windows Admin Center and it doesn't work because a functionnality is not installed. I did the same on PowerShell but the daemon refuse to launch due to unsufficients rights. I'm sure that Hyper-V and the containers are installed but perhaps i miss something - i'll you tell if i find something later.

As you guys highlight it : it seems that docker won't work well before the release of the WS Wait and see? I'm fairly sure LCOW works without virtualisation, although it doesn't work in many other important ways, so it's usage is very limited. Other than that, you will need virtualisation of some kind in order to run Linux containers on a Windows host. And since there is a huge difference in the level of functionality between WSL1 and 2 the later is the preferred.

Unfortunately for me neither. As mentioned on this thread, must have been dropped for security and performance reasons. The author in the comments says:. I assume it did, since it was working on LTSC up until recently. I use it as a developer and can test simultaneusly on Ubuntu But from a security perspective, it is a bit scary that you can have access to all your Windows partitions and do with the files whatever you want.

We use Windows Server as teamcity build agents and want to use docker in teamcity with support for linux containers and now it sounds like this is not going to happen and that we need a linux based build agent? I think, it is safe to assume that WS is not going to have any further feature updates given that WS was released. I think it is obvious that it won't happen for Windows Server , but maybe there's hope with Windows Server using the new Windows Subsystem for Linux Preview available on the store.

Yes, I know, the store is not exactly very practical on Windows Server, but I don't see why it wouldn't be possible to extract the contents of the msix bundle to try and run it directly on Windows Server For us, the effect is that, without WSL2 support on Server, we'll be moving to native linux VMs and containers, and it's a first step in moving away from MS stack. Small things lead to big changes MS It's really unfortunate, since most containers I need, won't run on wsl1.

And Hyper-V does indeed use a higher workload and is much slower in it's reaction times to user input. Really frustrating, that it's still not a thing in the Server. I suggest Microsoft implements WSL2 for at least Windows Server or Microsoft will loose much important companies, since it's more hasslefree to deploy containers on linux than it is on Windows.

The same counts for Kuberenetes in my opinion. Nowadays most of the new server side programs are containerized, in docker, and run with k8s. This is by default how many of the development team works except those with legacy technology that cannot be packed. Naturally people just moves away from windows server just because of this. I'll reproduce it here:. We've listened to feedback in this area and I'd like to clarify that WSL 2 distros are now supported on Windows server versions and 20H2.

This means that you can run WSL 2 distros on those Server versions. Thank you all for giving us your feedback here, I look forwards to hearing more as we give more updates when they're available. I'll be closing this one out for house keeping purposes. You can read more at this comment:.